Get ready for a dramatic change on the University of Cincinnati’s campus—one that’s bound to spark debate. The iconic Crosley Tower, once dubbed one of the 'eight ugliest university buildings' in the nation by Architectural Digest, is set to be demolished this week. But here’s where it gets controversial: while some see this as a long-overdue removal of an eyesore, others argue it’s a loss of architectural history, no matter how polarizing the design. So, is this a step forward or a missed opportunity? Let’s dive in.
Originally slated to begin earlier this week, the demolition has been delayed due to weather, with work now expected to kick off later in the week. Completed in 1969, the 16-story tower holds the distinction of being the second-largest single-poured concrete structure in the world, second only to the Hoover Dam. That’s right—this isn’t just any building. Its sheer scale and construction are feats of engineering, which raises the question: Should we preserve such achievements, even if they’re not aesthetically pleasing?
The University’s Board of Trustees has approved a nearly $50 million budget for the demolition, with the process expected to wrap up by year’s end. But what comes next is equally transformative. The site will be redeveloped into a state-of-the-art science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) facility, costing $215 million and spanning approximately 200,000 square feet. Slated for completion in June 2029, this new building promises to be a hub of innovation—a stark contrast to the tower it’s replacing.
And this is the part most people miss: The decision to demolish Crosley Tower wasn’t made overnight. Plans were first announced in 2018, giving the university ample time to weigh the pros and cons. Yet, the debate persists. Is tearing down a structure like this a necessary sacrifice for progress, or are we losing something unique in the process? What do you think? Share your thoughts in the comments—this is one conversation that’s far from over.
