Imagine the audacity: a group of activists, fueled by a desire for change, decided to make a rather messy statement at one of Britain's most iconic landmarks. Four individuals were arrested after a display case holding the Imperial State Crown, part of the Crown Jewels, at the Tower of London, was targeted with custard and apple crumble.
This incident, which occurred shortly before 10:00 GMT on a Saturday, led to the immediate closure of the Jewel House as the Metropolitan Police launched an investigation. The group, known as 'Take Back Power,' claimed responsibility, framing their actions as a call for a permanent citizen's assembly – a 'House of the People' – with the authority to 'tax extreme wealth and fix Britain.'
Footage shared by the group vividly depicted a protester dramatically flinging a large tray of crumble against the glass protecting the Imperial State Crown, followed by another pouring a generous helping of bright yellow custard. "Democracy has crumbled," one protester declared, with another adding, "Britain is broken. We've come here to the jewels of the nation to take back power."
But here's where it gets controversial... This isn't an isolated incident. This marks the second demonstration claimed by the group in just a few days. On the preceding Wednesday, three protesters made a statement by emptying bags of manure in the lobby of The Ritz hotel, right under its 25-foot Christmas tree.
The Imperial State Crown, a powerful symbol of the monarchy, is a truly remarkable piece. Worn by the King as he departed Westminster Abbey on his coronation day in 2023, it's a working crown used only for formal occasions, such as the State Opening of Parliament. When not in use, it resides in the Jewel House at the Tower of London.
And this is the part most people miss... Originally crafted in 1937 for the coronation of George VI, the crown is an extraordinary display of wealth and craftsmanship. It boasts an astonishing 2,868 diamonds, 17 sapphires, 11 emeralds, 4 rubies, and 269 pearls, weighing over a kilogram.
What do you think? Do you agree with the group's methods, or do you believe there are more effective ways to advocate for change? Share your thoughts in the comments below!
